🔗 Share this article

The recent resignations of the BBC's chief executive and its news chief over claims of bias have been characterized as an internal "coup" by a ex media executive.

David Yelland, who previously edited the Sun publication from 1998 to 2003, claimed during a radio program that the departures of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness followed methodical weakening by individuals close to the BBC board over an extended timeframe.

"It was a takeover, and more serious than that, it represented an internal operation. There were individuals inside the organization, extremely connected to the board ... serving on the governing body, who have systematically undermined Tim Davie and his senior team over a duration of [time] and this has been continuing for a considerable period. What transpired recently wasn't merely in isolation," the former editor commented.

Governance Failure Highlighted

"What has transpired here is there was a failure of governance. I don't blame the chairman [Samir Shah] as an individual, but the role of the leader of any organization, a corporation – including the BBC – is to keep their chief executive, their senior executive, in role or dismiss them. And that has failed to happen, because Tim Davie was not fired. He stepped down and so there existed, that represents the essence of, a failure of governance."

Background of Latest Controversy

The departures on Sunday followed period of attacks from the U.S. administration and conservative pundits in the UK that were triggered by allegations published by the Daily Telegraph.

The publication disclosed a leaked record of the conclusions of a former independent external adviser to its editorial guidelines committee, Michael Prescott, who left his role during the summer.

He had criticized the modification of a speech by Donald Trump in an edition of Panorama, which he claimed made it seem that Trump had encouraged the US Capitol incident. Two portions of the address that were combined together were spoken an hour apart, and the modification failed to mention that Trump had also stated he wanted his followers to protest peacefully.

Internal Reactions and External Perspectives

Yelland's comments echo a mood of dismay reported by sources within BBC News on Sunday evening, with one saying: "It feels like a takeover. This is the result of a campaign by political opponents of the BBC."

Others, encompassing Sky's former policy correspondent Adam Boulton, have claimed the general perception that Trump egged on the insurrection was fundamentally true. It is not unusual practice to combine segments of a lengthy speech to accurately summarize it.

Handover Plans and Organizational Effect

Davie stated his departure would wouldn't be immediate and that he was "managing" timings to guarantee an "orderly transition" over the coming period. Turness stated controversy around the Panorama modification had "reached a point where it is causing harm to the BBC – an institution that I value."

On Monday, the BBC reporter Nick Robinson revealed there had been inaction at the top of the BBC because, while its senior reporters desired to apologize for the editing error – but insist there was "no plan to mislead" the viewers – the politically appointed leaders wanted to go further.

Governmental Reaction and Wider Context

Shah is expected to express regret on Monday to the Commons' cultural affairs panel, and to provide further information on the Panorama program in his response to the panel, which had requested how he would address the issues.

Speaking after the departures, the government minister Louise Sandher-Jones rejected suggestions the BBC was institutionally partial. The veterans minister stated Sky News: "When you look at the huge spectrum of national matters, regional concerns, global issues, that it has to cover, I believe its output is highly trusted. When I speak to people who've got firmly established opinions on those, they're continuing using the BBC for much of their information, it's shaping their perspectives on this."