🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."