🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often spent years generating community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.